Rajasthan High Court
CW/16599/2026 of JAGDISH SINGH SISODIA SON OF SHRI LAKHA SINGH SISODIA Vs THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY on 24 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16599/2026 CNR: RJHC020808092026 | URN: CW / 34858U / 2026 Jagdish Singh Sisodia Son Of Shri Lakha Singh Sisodia, Aged About 57 Years 6 Months, Resident Of Plot No.145- A , Aadharsh Nagar, Ajmer. At Present Posted As
[2026:RJ-JP:34143]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16599/2026
CNR: RJHC020808092026 | URN: CW / 34858U / 2026
Jagdish Singh Sisodia Son Of Shri Lakha Singh Sisodia, Aged About 57 Years 6 Months, Resident Of Plot No.145-A, Aadharsh Nagar, Ajmer. At Present Posted As Superintendent, I.T.I.
Masuda, Beawar.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
The Additional Chief Secretary, Skilled Employment Udhmita Bhibhag, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
The Senior Dy. Secretary, Skilled Employment And Udhmita Bhibhag, Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Rajesh Mohan Rajkumawat
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
24/08/2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the order impugned dated 11.08.2026 marked as annexure-5, is bad in law as well as on facts. It is submitted that the learned Tribunal has wrongly noted that petitioner was transferred from ITI, Kekri, Ajmer to ITI, Masuda, Beawar, whereas in realistic terms, as per the contents reflected at page no. -28 serial no.46, the petitioner was transferred from ITI, Masuda, Beawar to ITI, Gudhamalani i.e. approximately 500 kms away. It is submitted that petitioner was transferred within a period of five months and he shall retire in next 2.5 years.
[2026:RJ-JP:34143] (2 of 2) [CW-16599/2026]
2. Considering the facts of the case, this Court gives liberty to the petitioner to file representation to the competent authority, which shall be filed and decided in view of the ratio encapsulated in SBCWP No. 14009/2026 titled Dr. Mahesh Meena v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.
3. This Court also directs that the impugned transfer order dated 10.07.2026, shall remain stayed for a period of 30 days, qua the petitioner; and the representation, if any, filed by the petitioner to be adjudicated within the said time.
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of. No prejudice be caused to the petitioner, on passing of the order dated 11.08.2026.
5. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J 46/DEEPAK