Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/11237/2026 of RAMAVTAR S/O SHRI BIJENDRA Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 24 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11237/2026 CNR: RJHC020673542026 | URN: CRLMB / 20761U / 2026 Ramavtar S/o Shri Bijendra, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Village Rasiya, Police Station Nagar, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In
[2026:RJ-JP:34339]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11237/2026
CNR: RJHC020673542026 | URN: CRLMB / 20761U / 2026
Ramavtar S/o Shri Bijendra, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Village Rasiya, Police Station Nagar, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Deeg)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Ms. Swati Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Aarti Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
24/08/2026
1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.7/2026 registered at Police Station Cyber Police Station Deeg, District Deeg for offences u/S 318(4), 61(2), 112(2)of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act.
2. Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the accused petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. She further submits that after conclusion of the investigation, the police has submitted charge-sheet in the matter. She also submits that the accused petitioner is in custody since 16.06.2026 and there is no criminal antecedent against the accused petitioner, therefore they may be released on bail.
[2026:RJ-JP:34339] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11237/2026]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application.
4. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner so also the fact that no other criminal case pending against the accused petitioner and he is in custody since 16.06.2026, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail.
5. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. In case the accused-petitioner is found to be involved in any other criminal case of similar nature in future, the prosecution may move application for cancellation of his bail. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/213