Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/3682/2026 of DILIP KUMAR SAINI S/O BODAN LAL SAINI Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 24 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3682/2026 CNR: RJHC020215102026 | URN: CRLMB / 6558U / 2026 Dilip Kumar Saini S/o Bodan Lal Saini, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Bhandodi, Police Station Malakheda, District Alwar (Raj.). (At Present Accused
[2026:RJ-JP:34235]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3682/2026
CNR: RJHC020215102026 | URN: CRLMB / 6558U / 2026
Dilip Kumar Saini S/o Bodan Lal Saini, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Bhandodi, Police Station Malakheda, District Alwar (Raj.). (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail, Alwar).
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Aatish Jain
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
24/08/2026
1. Instant bail application has been filed by petitioner under Section 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No.22/2026 registered at Police Station Aravali Vihar, District Alwar for offence(s) under Sections 318(4) of BNS and Section 66D of the IT Act.
2. It has been pointed out by counsel for petitioner that though multiple complaints in respect of cyber crime were received against petitioner, but in none of complaint, FIR has been chalked out and petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent; in the present FIR, after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed for offences under Section 318(4) of BNS and Section 66D of the IT Act, which are triable by the Magistrate; petitioner is in custody since 15.01.2026 and conclusion of trial will take considerable time, hence, petitioner be given benefit of bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.
[2026:RJ-JP:34235] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3682/2026]
4. Heard counsel for petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
5. Having considered the overall facts and circumstances of the present case and the fact that in the present FIR, after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed for offences under Section 318(4) of BNS and Section 66D of the IT Act, which are triable by the Magistrate; petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent; petitioner is in custody since 15.01.2026 and conclusion of trial will take considerable time, but without commenting on merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Dilip Kumar Saini S/o Bodan Lal Saini, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
7. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner is found involved in similar offence, during bail granted by this Court or breach of this condition is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail, granted by this Court. (SUDESH BANSAL), J 59/NITIN