Rajasthan High Court

CW/8848/2026 of SUBHASH CHAND PAREEK (SENIOR CITIZEN) S/O SHRI NATHULAL Vs RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION on 24 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8848/2026 CNR: RJHC020461892026 | URN: CW / 19576U / 2026 Subhash Chand Pareek (Senior Citizen) S/o Shri Nathulal, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Aluda, Tehsil Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan

[2026:RJ-JP:34159]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8848/2026

CNR: RJHC020461892026 | URN: CW / 19576U / 2026

Subhash Chand Pareek (Senior Citizen) S/o Shri Nathulal, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Aluda, Tehsil Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj.).

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Chairman Cum Managing Director, Head Office, Parivahan Marg, Chomu House, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

2.

Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corpora- tion, Sikar Depot, District Sikar, Rajasthan.

----Respondents

Connected With

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8847/2026

CNR: RJHC020461822026 | URN: CW / 19575U / 2026

Mohan Lal (Senior Citizen) S/o Shri Ramdev Singh, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Mukam Post Katraghal, District Sikar (Raj.).

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Chairman Cum Managing Director, Head Office, Parivahan Marg, Chomu House, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

2.

Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corpora- tion, Sikar Depot, District Sikar, Rajasthan.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Rahul Ghiya

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Rajpal Dhankar

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Judgment

24/08/2026

[2026:RJ-JP:34159] (2 of 2) [CW-8848/2026] Learned counsel for both the parties are in agreement and jointly submit that the controversy involved herein is squarely covered by the order dated 13.08.2026 passed by this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15295/2026 titled Om Prakash Sharma v. RSRTC and Anr. and pray that the present matter may also be disposed of in similar terms. In light of the consensus arrived at between the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the order passed in Om Prakash Sharma (supra), the present petition stands disposed of in same terms. It is directed that the ratio encapsulated in the judgment of Om Prakash Sharma (supra) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the present petitioner as well. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J 96/JUBIN

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead