Rajasthan High Court
CW/473/2018 of SUNIL CHOUDHARY Vs STATE OF RAJ AND ORS on 24 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 473/2018 CNR: RJHC020424842018 | URN: CW / 799U / 2018 Sunil Choudhary S/o Suraj Karan Nuwad, R/o Village Chak Pnglod, Post Pinglod, Vaya Salemabad, Tehsil Roopangarh, District Ajmer ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of
[2026:RJ-JP:34091]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 473/2018
CNR: RJHC020424842018 | URN: CW / 799U / 2018
Sunil Choudhary S/o Suraj Karan Nuwad, R/o Village Chak Pnglod, Post Pinglod, Vaya Salemabad, Tehsil Roopangarh, District Ajmer
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State Of Rajasthan Through The Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, G, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Ajmer
3.
The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jalore
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ram Pratap Saini
Mr. Aamir Khan
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Prateek Saxena for
Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Judgment
24/08/2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved herein is no more res integra and the same is covered by the order dated 13.08.2026 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15321/2026 titled Deepak Kumar Verma v. State of Rajasthan & Ors., as well as upon the judgment dated 04.08.2021 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6507/2017 titled Kindar v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
2. In light of the relied upon ratios, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to file
[2026:RJ-JP:34091] (2 of 2) [CW-473/2018] a representation before the respondent-authorities with a direction that the same be considered and decided in accordance with law.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the consensus arrived at between the parties, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh and detailed representation before the competent authority of the respondents.
5. Upon filing of such representation, the competent authority of the respondents is directed to consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law, keeping in view the applicability of the ratio laid down by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Kindar (supra) to the facts and circumstances of the present case.
6. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of.
7. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/6