Rajasthan High Court
CW/16628/2026 of SOHAN LAL SAINI S/O SHRI DURGA DUTT Vs THE RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT on 24 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16628/2026 CNR: RJHC020767202026 | URN: CW / 34916U / 2026 Sohan Lal Saini S/o Shri Durga Dutt, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Village Chirana, Kemarawali Dhani (Bagoraki Dhani), Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan)
[2026:RJ-JP:34257]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16628/2026
CNR: RJHC020767202026 | URN: CW / 34916U / 2026
Sohan Lal Saini S/o Shri Durga Dutt, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Village Chirana, Kemarawali Dhani (Bagoraki Dhani), Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
The Rajasthan State Road Transport, Chomu House, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur Through Its Chairman-Cum- Managing Director (Rajasthan).
2.
The Executive Director (Administration) And Authorised Appellate Officer, , Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Chomu House, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
3.
The Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jhunjhunu Depot, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan).
4.
The Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, , Vidhyadhar Nagar Depot, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
24/08/2026
1. Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya, learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, seeks to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file representation before the respondent(s) - authority for ventilation of the petitioner's grievances and in the event, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the
[2026:RJ-JP:34257] (2 of 2) [CW-16628/2026] respondent(s) - authority is directed to consider the same in a time bound manner.
2. Considering the limited submission so made and without delving into the merits of the matter, the writ petition stands disposed of while granting liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the respondent(s) - authority for redressal of his grievances within a period of 30 days and in the event of any such representation being filed, the respondents are directed to consider and decide the same expeditiously strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order within a period of 30 days thereafter after granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
3. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
4. Needless to say, this order has been passed only to consider the petitioner's representation strictly in accordance with law and in no manner is to be construed as a direction to consider the same in a particular manner. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J JAYANT KUMAR /08