Rajasthan High Court
CW/16714/2026 of SHRI VASDEV MOOLCHANDANI SON OF SHRI REWA LAL MOOLCHANDANI Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 24 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16714/2026 CNR: RJHC020822722026 | URN: CW / 35012U / 2026 Shri Vasdev Moolchandani Son Of Shri Rewa Lal Moolchandani, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of House No.320, Sindhi Colony, Raja Park, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur, Presently
[2026:RJ-JP:34153]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16714/2026
CNR: RJHC020822722026 | URN: CW / 35012U / 2026
Shri Vasdev Moolchandani Son Of Shri Rewa Lal Moolchandani, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of House No.320, Sindhi Colony, Raja Park, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur, Presently Programmer, State Insurance And Provident Fund Department, Headquarters, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Information Technology
And
Communication, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.
Technical Director And Joint Secretary, Information And Technology Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Saurav Harsh
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Vinayam Saran for
Mr. B.S. Chhaba, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
24/08/2026
1. Present writ petition has been filed assailing the order dated 18.08.2026 passed by the learned Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur in Appeal No.2141/2026 whereby the interim relief sought by the appellant in the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed.
2. Upon perusal of the material available on record, hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and perusal of the relevant portion of the order dated 18.08.2026 i.e. 'para-9', this Court is of the view that the impugned order needs no interference, as the same is passed after due consideration of the material aspects of
[2026:RJ-JP:34153] (2 of 2) [CW-16714/2026] the matter at hand. For sake of handiness the relevant extract from the impugned order is reproduced hereinbelow: "पत्रावली
परउपलब्धदस्तावेजोंकेअवलोकनसेस्पष्टहैकि
अपीलार्थीकीसेवानिवृत्तिदिनांक31.08.2027
कोहोनाप्रस्तावित
है।आलोच्यस्थानांतरणआदेशदिनांक09.07.2026
कोजारीहुआ
है।अपीलार्थीकीसेवानिवृत्तिमेंलगभग12
माहसेअधिककासमय
शेषहै।अधिकरणद्वारासामान्यतः केवलऐसेमामलोंमेंहस्तक्षेप
कि याजाताहै,
जहाँकर्मचारीसेवानिवृत्तिकेअत्यंतनिकटहोतथा12
माहअथवाउससेकमअवधि शेषहो।वर्तमानप्रकरणमेंअपीलार्थी
उक्तश्रेणीमेंनहींआताहैक्योंकि अपीलार्थीकीसेवानिवृत्ति12 माह
सेअधिककासमयशेषहै।अपीलार्थीकेसंबंधमेंजारीकि यागया
आलोच्यआदेशप्रशासनिकआवश्यकताएवंजनहितमेंसक्षम
प्राधिकारीद्वाराजारीकि यागयाहै।कोईभीकर्मचारीएकहीस्थान
परबनेरहनेकावैधानिकअधिकारनहींरखताहै,
जबतक
स्थानान्तरण/
पदस्थापनआदेशमेंअधिकारक्षेत्रसेबाहरयाकोई
स्पष्टदुर्भावना(Malafide)
अथवाकि सीवैधानिकनियमकाउलंघन
नहो,
तबतकआलोच्यआदेशकोरोकानहींजासकताहै।"
3. Withal, relying upon the judgment passed by the Apex Court in the case of Shilpi Bose & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar & ors. reported in 1991 Supp (2) SCC 659, liberty is given to the petitioner to raise his genuine difficulty of retirement in a short time, before the competent authority, and the same will be considered sympathetically, in accordance with law within a period of 30 days.
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J 55/DEEPAK