Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/4780/2026 of SHIVSHANKAR ARORA S/O SHRI RAMESHWAR LAL ARORA Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 24 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4780/2026 CNR: RJHC020291892026 | URN: CRLMB / 8601U / 2026 Shivshankar Arora S/o Shri Rameshwar Lal Arora, Aged About 54 Years, R/o 17/514, Chopasani Housing Board, Jodhpur Rajasthan. (At Present Accused

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4780/2026

CNR: RJHC020291892026 | URN: CRLMB / 8601U / 2026

Shivshankar Arora S/o Shri Rameshwar Lal Arora, Aged About 54

Years, R/o 17/514, Chopasani Housing Board, Jodhpur Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined Central Ail Jaipur)

----Petitioner

Versus

State of Rajasthan through Pp

----Respondent

Connected With

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9889/2026

CNR: RJHC020585002026 | URN: CRLMB / 18332U / 2026

Ishwar Chaudhary @ Shivraj Sharma S/o Bhagwan Das, Aged About 62 Years, R/o D-9/113 Chitrakoot Yojna Jaipur At Present Lochan Complex First Floor Karkunj Chauraha Near Kargil Petrol Pump Apara Uttar Pradesh (Presently Confined At Central Jail, Jaipur).

----Petitioner

Versus

State of Rajasthan through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Surya Pratap Singh

Mr. R.B. Sharma Ganthola

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP

Mr. Devendra Kumar Bhardwaj

Ms. Jaya Soni for complainant

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

24/08/2026

1. Both bail applications have been filed by petitioners under Section 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 361/2025 registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar, District Jaipur City (East) for offence(s) under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 336(4) and 61(2) of the BNS.

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-4780/2026]

2. It has been submitted by counsel for petitioners that allegation against petitioners is in respect of committing fraud with the complainant by selling the property on false power of attorney and receiving the huge amount; after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been filed; in the previous criminal cases, petitioners have been stated to be on bail or have been acquitted in most of the cases; petitioners are stated to be in custody since 03.03.2026 & 26.02.2026 respectively and conclusion of trial will take a considerable time, hence, petitioners be given benefit of bail.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for complainant opposed the bail applications.

4. Heard counsel for petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for complainant and perused the material available on record.

5. Having considered the overall facts and circumstances of the present case and the fact that allegation against petitioners is in respect of committing fraud with the complainant by selling the property on false power of attorney and receiving the huge amount; after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been filed; in the previous criminal cases, petitioners have been stated to be on bail or have been acquitted in most of the cases; petitioners are stated to be in custody since 03.03.2026 & 26.02.2026 respectively and conclusion of trial will take a considerable time, but without commenting on merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioners on bail.

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-4780/2026]

6. Accordingly, both bail applications are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners (i) Shivshankar Arora S/o Shri Rameshwar Lal Arora & (ii) Ishwar Chaudhary @ Shivraj Sharma S/o Bhagwan Das, shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

7. However, it is made clear that petitioner shall not repeat the similar nature of offence or shall not induce or threaten any prosecution witness, during bail granted by this Court. In case, breach of any condition is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail, granted by this Court. (SUDESH BANSAL), J 63/NITIN

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead