Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/5656/2026 of SUNIL KUMAR BENIWAL S/O GULAB CHAND BENIWAL Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 24 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5656/2026 CNR: RJHC020342282026 | URN: CRLMB / 10098U / 2026 Sunil Kumar Beniwal S/o Gulab Chand Beniwal, Aged About 48 Years, R/o D-48, Dev Nagar Opp. Glash Factory, Tonk Road, Police Station Bajaj Nagar,

[2026:RJ-JP:34241]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5656/2026

CNR: RJHC020342282026 | URN: CRLMB / 10098U / 2026

Sunil Kumar Beniwal S/o Gulab Chand Beniwal, Aged About 48

Years, R/o D-48, Dev Nagar Opp. Glash Factory, Tonk Road, Police Station Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur (East) ( At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur District Jaipur)

----Petitioner

Versus

State of Rajasthan through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Suresh Kumar

Ms. Pratibha Gupta

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

24/08/2026

1. Instant bail application has been filed by petitioner under Section 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No.33/2025 registered at Police Station Moti Dungri, District Jaipur City (East) for offence under Sections 314, 316(2), 318(2) & 323 of BNS. Subsequently, charge-sheet has been submitted for offences under Sections 316(2), 318(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2) of BNS.

2. It has been submitted by counsel for petitioner that allegation against the petitioner is to draw a bank loan of Rs.14.50 lakhs in connivance with the bank employees, disclosing himself to be a government employee; after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed and in the previous criminal cases, petitioner has been stated to be acquitted; petitioner is in custody since 26.03.2026 and

[2026:RJ-JP:34241] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5656/2026] conclusion of trial will take a considerable time, hence, petitioner be released on bail.

3. Heard counsel for petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

4. Taking into consideration facts and circumstances of the present case and the fact that allegation against the petitioner is to draw a bank loan of Rs.14.50 lakhs in connivance with the bank employees, disclosing himself to be a government employee; after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed and in the previous criminal cases, petitioner has been stated to be acquitted; petitioner is in custody since 26.03.2026 and conclusion of trial will take a considerable time, but without commenting on merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

5. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Sunil Kumar Beniwal S/o Gulab Chand Beniwal, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SUDESH BANSAL), J 73/NITIN

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead