Rajasthan High Court
CCP/546/2026 of GOVIND SHARMA SON OF SHRI KAILASH CHANDRA SHARMA, Vs SH. ARVIND SHRIVASTAVA, on 21 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 546/2026 CNR: RJHC020341322026 | URN: CCP / 582U / 2026 Govind Sharma Son Of Shri Kailash Chandra Sharma, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 109, Alankar Vihar- A , Thandu Baba Ki Dhani, Meenawala, Sirsi Road,
[2026:RJ-JP:33843]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 546/2026
CNR: RJHC020341322026 | URN: CCP / 582U / 2026
Govind Sharma Son Of Shri Kailash Chandra Sharma, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 109, Alankar Vihar-A, Thandu Baba Ki Dhani, Meenawala, Sirsi Road, Panchyawala, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Licensee Of Composite Liquor Shop At G.p.
Dhankya Plus G.p. Mudiyaramsar (F.y.-2025-2026), Shop Code 1408006.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Sh. Arvind Shrivastava, Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
Sh. Nimit Mehta, Commissioner, Excise Department, Government Of Rajasthan, , Gumaniwala, Panchwati, Udaipur, Rajasthan.
3.
Sh. Rajendra Prasad Garg, District Excise Officer, Jaipur Rural, Rajasthan.
4.
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Finance Secretary, Finance Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Utsav Verma, for
Mr. Manish Bhodiwal
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
21/08/2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this contempt petition has become infructuous, as the respondents have complied with the order of the Court, which is subject matter of this contempt petition.
[2026:RJ-JP:33843] (2 of 2) [CCP-546/2026] Accordingly, the present contempt petition is dismissed having become infructuous. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 28/SHRUTI SHARMA