Rajasthan High Court
CW/16100/2026 of ASHOK KUMAR S/O SHRI GOPALRAM Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 21 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16100/2026 CNR: RJHC020787382026 | URN: CW / 34112U / 2026 Ashok Kumar S/o Shri Gopalram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Bochi, Post Ganedi, Tehsil Nechhwa, Distt. Sikar (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan,
[2026:RJ-JP:33805]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16100/2026
CNR: RJHC020787382026 | URN: CW / 34112U / 2026
Ashok Kumar S/o Shri Gopalram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Bochi, Post Ganedi, Tehsil Nechhwa, Distt. Sikar (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2.
Mission Director, National Health Mission, Rajasthan, Medical, Health And Family Welfare Department, Swastha Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur (Raj.).
3.
Chief Medical And Health Officer, Sikar (Raj.).
4.
Shree Shyam Services, Vpo-Kurbara, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, Distt. Sikar (Raj.).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
21/08/2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted liberty to file representation for redressal of his grievance before the competent authority.
2. In the event of any such representation being filed by the petitioner within fifteen days from today, the competent authority is directed to objectively consider and decide the same within thirty days thereafter, by passing a speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of
[2026:RJ-JP:33805] (2 of 2) [CW-16100/2026] hearing to the petitioner and also to consider his engagement in the event any vacancy exists.
3. Needless to say that the present order has been passed only to decide the representation as submitted by the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law, and in no manner is to be construed as a direction to decide the said representation in a particular manner.
4. With the said directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of.
5. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J 9/DIPESH CHAYAL