Rajasthan High Court
CCP/823/2025 of SHOORSINGH S/O SHRI SIYARAM Vs SHRI AKHIL ARORA, on 21 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 823/2025 CNR: RJHC020676662025 | URN: CCP / 878U / 2025 1. Shoorsingh S/o Shri Siyaram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village And Post Singaniya, Tehsil Todabhim, District Karauli. 2. Vikas Meena S/o Chandra Lal Meena, R/o
[2026:RJ-JP:33873]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 823/2025
CNR: RJHC020676662025 | URN: CCP / 878U / 2025
1.
Shoorsingh S/o Shri Siyaram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village And Post Singaniya, Tehsil Todabhim, District Karauli.
2.
Vikas Meena S/o Chandra Lal Meena, R/o Manderoo, Tehsil Todabhim, District Karauli.
3.
Rajendra S/o Ruggi, R/o Village Devlane, District Karauli (Raj.).
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
Shri Akhil Arora, Additional Chief Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
Shri Dinesh Goyal, Chief Engineer (Rural), Public Health Engineering Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3.
Shri Parveen Kumar Lekhera, Joint Secretary (I), Public Health Engineering Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur
4.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Ms. Renu Saini
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG, alongwith
Mr. Kuldeep Singh Rathore
Mr. Praveen Lakhera, Secretary, PHED
Mr. Shyam Lal Jatav, OIC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
21/08/2026 Learned Additional Advocate General, Ms. Mahi Yadav appearing for the respondents states that the due compliance of the order dated 15.01.2025 passed in SBCWP No. 19683/2024 has been made by deciding the representation of the petitioner by speaking order dated 22.12.2025. She has placed before this
[2026:RJ-JP:33873] (2 of 2) [CCP-823/2025] Court the copy of order dated 22.12.2025, which is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also been served with the copy of order dated 22.12.2025. In view of the above, in opinion of this Court, the order of the Court has been complied with. Hence this contempt petition is disposed of. Contempt notices stand discharged and bailable warrants issued for the respondents are also discharged. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/81