Rajasthan High Court

CW/15964/2026 of DINESH MEENA S/O TEJ LAL MEENA Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 21 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15964/2026 CNR: RJHC020768412026 | URN: CW / 33974U / 2026 Dinesh Meena S/o Tej Lal Meena, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Meenavas, Jhopadin, Berkhera, Po Berkhera, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of

[2026:RJ-JP:33784]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15964/2026

CNR: RJHC020768412026 | URN: CW / 33974U / 2026

Dinesh Meena S/o Tej Lal Meena, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Meenavas, Jhopadin, Berkhera, Po Berkhera, District Dausa, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary To Government, Finance, Excise And Taxation Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.

2.

Inspector, Genral, Registration And Stamps Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Lohagal Road, Ajmer - 305001

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Ram Pratap Saini

For Respondent(s)

:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

21/08/2026

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that the petitioner has been placed under suspension vide order dated 21.02.2025 (Annexure-1) and a period of more than eighteen months have passed since then and thus, he prays that he may be granted liberty to file representation before the respondent - authorities for seeking his reinstatement in the service.

2. Considering the limited submission so made and without delving into merits of the matter, the present writ petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to file representation

[2026:RJ-JP:33784] (2 of 2) [CW-15964/2026] before the respondent - authorities, within a period of fifteen days from today.

3. In the event of any such representation being filed by the petitioner, respondent - authorities are directed to consider and decide the same, by passing a speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within thirty days thereafter.

4. Needless to say that the present order has been passed only to decide the representation as submitted by the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law, and in no manner is to be construed as a direction to decide the said representation in a particular manner.

5. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J 7/Dipesh Chayal

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead