Rajasthan High Court
CCP/1114/2026 of PRADEEP GAUTAM SON OF SHRI RAM SWAROOP GAUTAM Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 21 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1114/2026 CNR: RJHC020627892026 | URN: CCP / 1166U / 2026 Pradeep Gautam Son Of Shri Ram Swaroop Gautam, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Brahmpuri, Ward Number 11, Hanja Kua, Tehsil Anta, District Baran- 325202(Raj.).
[2026:RJ-JP:33874]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1114/2026
CNR: RJHC020627892026 | URN: CCP / 1166U / 2026
Pradeep Gautam Son Of Shri Ram Swaroop Gautam, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Brahmpuri, Ward Number 11, Hanja Kua, Tehsil Anta, District Baran- 325202(Raj.). Mobile Number 9887234091.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health Services, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 302005.
2.
Smt. Gaytri A Rathore, Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health Service, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
302005.
3.
Shri Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Director (Non Gazetted)
Medical And Health Service, Sawasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.) 302005.
4.
Shri Sushil Kumar Parmar, Additional Director (Gezetted)
Medical And Health Services, Sawasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.).-302005.
5.
Dr. Jagdish Soni, Joint Director, Medical And Health Service, Kota Zone, Kota.
6.
Dr. Sanjeev Saxena, Chief Medical And Health Officer, Baran(Raj.).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Iliyas Khan
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Tanvisha Pant
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
21/08/2026 Learned counsel appearing for the respondents states that the compliance of the order which is the subject mater of this
[2026:RJ-JP:33874] (2 of 2) [CCP-1114/2026] contempt petition, has been made by deciding the representation of the petitioner vide order dated 13.08.2026. In view of the aforesaid fact, this contempt petition is disposed of. Contempt notices stand discharged. However the petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the order passed by the respondents on his representation by availing the appropriate remedy available to him under the law if he feels aggrieved by the same. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/90