Rajasthan High Court
CW/16835/2026 of SAVITA SHARMA W/O SHRI SATYENDRA KAUSHIK D/O SHRI B.L. SHARMA Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 21 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16835/2026 CNR: RJHC020823842026 | URN: CW / 35205U / 2026 Savita Sharma W/o Shri Satyendra Kaushik D/o Shri B.l. Sharma, Aged About 49 Years, R/o 3/12 Parashram Nagar, Dher Ke Balaji, Jaipur, At Present Working As Sdm At
[2026:RJ-JP:33975]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16835/2026
CNR: RJHC020823842026 | URN: CW / 35205U / 2026
Savita Sharma W/o Shri Satyendra Kaushik D/o Shri B.l.
Sharma, Aged About 49 Years, R/o 3/12 Parashram Nagar, Dher Ke Balaji, Jaipur, At Present Working As Sdm At Dataramgarh, District Sikar.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Personnel Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
Joint Secretary, Personnel (Ka-4) Department, Jaipur.
3.
District Collector, Sikar.
4.
Amrita Khandelwal, Ras, Through Joint Secretary, Personnel (Ka-4) Department, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Vijay Pathak
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Judgment
21/08/2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner could not refute that the petitioners would be covered under the definition of ‘government servant’, as prescribed under Section 2(c) of Rajasthan Civil Services (Service Matters Appellate Tribunals) Act 1976 (for short “Act of 1976”), nor could the learned counsel for the petitioner refute that the lis in question also falls under the ‘service matters’, as defined under Section 2(f) of the Act of 1976. In view thereof, since the petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy available in law, the learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed
[2026:RJ-JP:33975] (2 of 2) [CW-16835/2026] for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to approach the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal (for short “RAT”) for redressal of his grievance. Considering the oral prayer, the present petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the RAT for redressal of his grievance. If the petitioner files appropriate petition before the RAT within a period of 30 days, the RAT shall adjudicate the same on merits as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months. Needless to say, no prejudice to be caused to the petitioner based on any observations made hereinabove. The writ petition stands disposed of in above terms. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/s-191