Rajasthan High Court
CW/16323/2026 of DILIP KUMAR SON OF SHRI NAHNU RAM Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 21 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16323/2026 CNR: RJHC020771222026 | URN: CW / 34435U / 2026 Dilip Kumar Son Of Shri Nahnu Ram, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Shiv Colony, Agra Road, Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary,
[2026:RJ-JP:33869]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16323/2026
CNR: RJHC020771222026 | URN: CW / 34435U / 2026
Dilip Kumar Son Of Shri Nahnu Ram, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Shiv Colony, Agra Road, Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Secondary Education, Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2.
Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner.
3.
Principal, Govt. Senior Secondary School, Ajabgarh, (Thanagazi), Alwar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Kailash Chander Sharma with
Mr. Ankit Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Abhishek Sharma with
Ms. Pooja Sharma for
Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
21/08/2026
1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner being aggrieved by the order dated 31.07.2026 (Annexure-4), vide which the petitioner was made to retire.
2. Mr. Kailash Chander Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the application seeking voluntary retirement dated 10.06.2026 was withdrawn by the petitioner on 28.07.2026 itself, which was the date prior to his retirement coming into effect, the impugned order whereby the petitioner has been made to retire w.e.f. 31.07.2026, could not have been passed.
3. In support of the aforementioned submission, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the judgment dated 20.03.2025 passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.737/2023, titled as Bhikam Chand Vs. The State of Rajasthan and order dated 28.04.2026 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at
[2026:RJ-JP:33869] (2 of 2) [CW-16323/2026] Principal Seat, Jodhpur in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8266/2026, titled as Ajeet Kumar Marothi Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a representation in this regard has already been submitted by the petitioner before the respondents and no action has been taken by the respondents till date and ends of justice would be met if the respondents are directed to consider and decide the said representation.
5. Issue notice to the respondents.
6. Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate with Ms. Pooja Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Manoj Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, puts in appearance on behalf of all the respondents.
7. Hence, service is complete and notice need not be filed.
8. Learned counsel for the respondents submit that the representation filed by the petitioner before the respondents would be considered and decided in accordance with law.
9. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties and without delving into the merits/demerits of the case, the respondents are directed to consider and decide the representation dated 03.08.2026 filed by the petitioner, in accordance with law, more particularly in light of the law laid down in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.737/2023 and S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8266/2026, by passing a reasoned and speaking order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
10. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of.
11. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(ANUROOP SINGHI),J 16/DANISH USMANI