Rajasthan High Court
CCP/1318/2026 of RAJESH KUMAR MEENA SON OF SHRI SUKHRAM MEENA, Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 21 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1318/2026 CNR: RJHC020766372026 | URN: CCP / 1377U / 2026 Rajesh Kumar Meena Son Of Shri Sukhram Meena, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of 909, Mantri Ki Dhani, Mandawari, Dausa (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of
[2026:RJ-JP:33878]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1318/2026
CNR: RJHC020766372026 | URN: CCP / 1377U / 2026
Rajesh Kumar Meena Son Of Shri Sukhram Meena, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of 909, Mantri Ki Dhani, Mandawari, Dausa (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2.
Smt. Gayatri A. Rathore, Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
3.
Ravi Prakash Sharma, Director (Public Health), Medical And Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur Zone, Jaipur (Raj.).
4.
Sitaram Meena, Chief Medical And Health Officer, Dausa, District Dausa (Raj.).
5.
Rajpal Meena, Block Chief Medical And Health Officer, Block Lalsot, District Dausa (Raj.).
6.
Vaibhav Sharma, Medical Officer Incharge, Swasthya Kalyan Kendra, Janta Clinic, Kothiwali Dhani, Mandawari, Block Lalsot, District Dausa (Raj.).
7.
Sanjy Yadav, Proprietor, Kiran Enterprises, Plot No. 67-A, Shiv Colony-B, Tonk Road, Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj.).
8.
Sushil Kumar Gurjar Son Of Shri Ramavtar Gurjar, G.n.m.
Janta Clinic, Kothiwali Dhani, Mandawari, Block Lalsot, District Dausa(Raj.).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Rajveer Gurjar
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Tanvisha Pant
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
21/08/2026
[2026:RJ-JP:33878] (2 of 2) [CCP-1318/2026] This contempt petition has been filed alleging non- compliance of order dated 25.05.2026. The Court, by order dated 25.05.2026, the Court directed the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue on the post on the same remuneration on which he was engaged in the year 2023. Ms. Tanvisha Pant, counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 6 and 8 states that in compliance of the order, the petitioner has been allowed joining on 12.08.2026. She has also placed before this Court the letter dated 13.08.2026 which speaks that the petitioner has joined on 12.08.2026. The letter dated 13.08.2026 is taken on record. In view of the above, this Court is of the opinion that the order passed by the Court has been complied with. Hence this contempt petition is disposed of. Contempt notices stand discharged. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/104