Rajasthan High Court
WMAP/214/2026 of SARITA JHJHADIYA D/O SHRI VIDYADHAR JHAJHADIYA, W/O SHRI MUKESH KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 20 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 214/2026 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16081/2023 CNR: RJHC020424002026 | URN: WMAP / 493U / 2026 1. Sarita Jhjhadiya D/o Shri Vidyadhar Jhajhadiya, W/o Shri Mukesh Kumar, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village And Post
[2026:RJ-JP:33568]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 214/2026
in
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16081/2023
CNR: RJHC020424002026 | URN: WMAP / 493U / 2026
1.
Sarita Jhjhadiya D/o Shri Vidyadhar Jhajhadiya, W/o Shri Mukesh Kumar, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village And Post Sultana, Tehsil Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
2.
Komal Rani Garg W/o Shri Hari Mohan Gupta, Aged About 33 Years, R/o B-76, Deepk Nagar, Paldi Meena, Agra Road, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
2.
The Registrar Education Departmental Examinations Rajasthan, Staff Selection Exam For Government English Medium Schools, Rajasthan, 2023, Bikaner (Raj.)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Pushpendra Kumar for Mr.
Sandeep Garssa
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG with Ms.
Pooja Sharma, AAAG & Mr. Abhishek
Sharma, AAAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
20/08/2026
1. Learned AAG appearing on behalf of respondents submits that the applicants petitioners have raised a new ground and for redressal, they may submit a representation to the respondents, which may be considered by the respondents,
[2026:RJ-JP:33568] (2 of 2) [WMAP-214/2026] considering the grounds mentioned in the representation, an appropriate decision be taken by the respondents.
2. Learned counsel for applicants-petitioners agreed to aforesaid and submitted that the writ misc. application be disposed on the basis of liberty to the petitioners-applicants.
3. Having considered aforesaid, the applicants are given a liberty to file a representation to the respondents within a period of four weeks from now on the grounds raised in the application and after receipt, the respondents shall consider and decide the representation considering the grounds mentioned in the representation within a period of four weeks but with a reasoned and speaking order.
4. Needless to say that a copy of the order be supplied to the petitioners, after decision.
5. Hence, the instant writ misc. application stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J 35/CHETNA BEHRANI