Rajasthan High Court
CCP/490/2026 of UDAL S/O KISHAN SINGH, Vs SMT. GAYATRI A. RATHORE, on 20 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 490/2026 CNR: RJHC020267392026 | URN: CCP / 523U / 2026 Udal S/o Kishan Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vpo Ballabhgarh, Tehsil Bhusawar, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Smt. Gayatri A . Rathore,
[2026:RJ-JP:33510]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 490/2026
CNR: RJHC020267392026 | URN: CCP / 523U / 2026
Udal S/o Kishan Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vpo Ballabhgarh, Tehsil Bhusawar, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Smt. Gayatri A. Rathore, Secretary, Medical, Health And Family Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.
Dr. S.s. Agrawal, Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Jhalana, Institutional Area, Jaipur (Raj.).
3.
Sh. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Director(Non-Gazette), Medical, Health And Family Welfare Department, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur (Raj.).
4.
Dr. Gaurav Kapoor, The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Bharatpur.
5.
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Medical, Health And Family Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Aamir Khan
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Tanvisha Pant on behalf of
Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
20/08/2026
1. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner has been declared selected for the Post of Nursing Officer vide order dated 19.08.2026 and the necessary appointment order shall also be issued within a period of three days.
[2026:RJ-JP:33510] (2 of 2) [CCP-490/2026]
2. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents, the present contempt petition is disposed of.
3. Contempt notices are discharged.
4. In case, the appointment order is not issued within the period of three days, the petitioner would be at liberty to make an application for revival of this contempt petition.
5. It is made clear that in issuing the appointment order, the Model Code of Conduct for elections shall not come in way. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 76/ARTI SHARMA