Rajasthan High Court

CCP/1021/2025 of PAVAN PURI SADHU S/O JAGDISH PURI SADHU Vs GAYATRI RATHORE, on 20 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1021/2025 CNR: RJHC020761592025 | URN: CCP / 1087U / 2025 Pavan Puri Sadhu S/o Jagdish Puri Sadhu, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Post Jhonsawa, Tehsil Galiyakot, Dungarpur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Gayatri Rathore, The

[2026:RJ-JP:33654]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1021/2025

CNR: RJHC020761592025 | URN: CCP / 1087U / 2025

Pavan Puri Sadhu S/o Jagdish Puri Sadhu, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Post Jhonsawa, Tehsil Galiyakot, Dungarpur (Raj.).

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

Gayatri Rathore, The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

2.

Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Director (Non-Gazetted), Health And Family Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3.

Dr. S.s. Agrawal, Director, State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare, Jhalana Doongri, Jaipur.

4.

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Jaipur, Rajasthan

----Respondents

Connected With

S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1022/2025

CNR: RJHC020761482025 | URN: CCP / 1088U / 2025

Lakshmi Patel W/o Dinesh Kumar Patel, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Mukam Post Kanba, Dungarpur (Raj.).

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

Gayatri Rathore, The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

2.

Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Director (Non-Gazetted), Health And Family Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3.

Dr. S.S. Agrawal, Director, State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare, Jhalana Doongri, Jaipur.

4.

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Jaipur, Rajasthan

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Abhijeet Sharma,

Mr. Tejmal Sharma

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Yash Joshi, for

Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG

[2026:RJ-JP:33654]

(2 of 2)

[CCP-1021/2025]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

20/08/2026

1. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioners have been declared selected for the Post of Nursing Officer vide order dated 17.08.2026 and the necessary appointment orders shall also be issued within a period of three days.

2. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents, the present contempt petitions are disposed of.

3. Contempt notices are discharged.

4. In case, the appointment orders are not issued within the period of three days, the petitioners would be at liberty to make applications for revival of these contempt petitions.

5. It is made clear that in issuing the appointment orders, the Model Code of Conduct for elections shall not come in way.

6. The copy of this order be placed in connected file. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 111,112/SHRUTI SHARMA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead