Rajasthan High Court
CMA/4507/2025 of ASHOK S/O KAILASHCHAND Vs SOHAN RAJ S/O RAMLAL on 20 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 4507/2025 CNR: RJHC020868842025 | URN: CMA / 7748U / 2025 Ashok S/o Kailashchand, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Gram Bajata, Tehsil Sawar, Dist. Ajmer, At Present, Dist. Kekdi, Rajasthan. ----Appellant Versus 1. Sohan Raj
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 4507/2025
CNR: RJHC020868842025 | URN: CMA / 7748U / 2025
Ashok S/o Kailashchand, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Gram Bajata, Tehsil Sawar, Dist. Ajmer, At Present, Dist. Kekdi, Rajasthan.
----Appellant
Versus
1.
Sohan Raj S/o Ramlal, R/o Ashok Nagar Bada Nayaganv, Tehsil Hindoli, Dist. Bundi, Rajasthan. (Driver Of The Car Rj21-Ub-9171)
2.
Ashok S/o Jugal Kishor, R/o Inana P.s. Mundva, Dist.
Nagaur At Present R 7/1, Jai Shri Dhan, C.H.H.L. Link Road Bangurnagar Gore Ganv, West Moti Lal Nagar Mumbai. (Registered Owner Of The Car RJ21-UB-9171)
3.
Sanjay Kumar S/o Sampat Lal, R/o Inana, Tehsil Mundva, Dist. Nagaur, Rajasthan. (Power Of Attorney Of The Car RJ21-UB-9171)
4.
Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Company Ltd., Branch 0- 12-A, Mundra Tower, Second Floor, Ashok Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan. (Insurer Of The Car RJ21-UB-
9171)
----Respondents
For Appellant(s)
:
Mr. Abhishek B. Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Mohsin for
Mr. Rizwan Ahmed
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
20/08/2026
1. This appeal has been preferred for enhancement of the compensation amount awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No. 1, Bundi, in MACT Case No.498/2023.
(2 of 3) [CMA-4507/2025]
2. Looking to the fact that the insurance company jointly saddled with the liability to pay compensation to the claimant, the service upon respondent No. 1, 2 and 3 is dispensed with.
3. Learned counsels appearing for the appellant and the respondent No. 4 Insurance Company, state that the parties have entered into a compromise which has been placed on record. The terms and conditions of compromise are as under:- "1. In addition to the award already passed by the Tribunal, a lump-sum amount of Rs. 2,36,000/- (Rs. Two Lac Thirty Six Thousand only) (including interest) shall be paid to claimant by insurance company by depositing the same before the learned Tribunal concern within 6 weeks from date of disposal of appeal in terms of this compromise towards full & final settlement of the claim. The award so enhanced is agreed to be paid to the claimants through saving bank account. The Claimants shall not claim any other amount or interest in respect of his claim.
2. In case, the insurance company fails to deposit the said amount within 6 weeks from the date of disposal of appeal in terms of this compromise, the claimants shall be entitled for interest @ 6% PA after 6 weeks from the date of disposal of appeal in terms of compromise till payment is made.
3. The appeal is agreed to be dispose off in terms of this compromise."
4. In view of the compromise, the present appeal is disposed of in the light of the terms and conditions of the compromise arrived at between the parties. The parties shall abide by the terms and conditions for the compromise.
(3 of 3) [CMA-4507/2025]
5. Non-compliance of the terms and conditions of the compromise, will be treated to be contempt of Court order.
6. Pending application(s), is any, also stands disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 61/EKTA SAINI