Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/12312/2026 of MOSUF S/O MANJOOR Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 20 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12312/2026 CNR: RJHC020736912026 | URN: CRLMB / 22677U / 2026 Mosuf S/o Manjoor, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Udai Kalan, Sai Mohalla, P.s. Sadar, Gangapur District Sawaimadhopur (At Present Confined In

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12312/2026

CNR: RJHC020736912026 | URN: CRLMB / 22677U / 2026

Mosuf S/o Manjoor, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Udai Kalan, Sai Mohalla, P.s. Sadar, Gangapur District Sawaimadhopur (At Present Confined In Sub-Jail Hindaun City).

----Accused-Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Rajesh Gadwal

Mr. Waseem Akram

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Naresh Gupta, P.P.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA

Judgment / Order

20/08/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 24.07.2026 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 02, Hindaun City, District Karauli, in Criminal Misc. Case (CIS) No.498/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.217/2026, Police Station New Mandi, District Hindaun City for the offences under Section 112(2) of the BNS 2023, and Section 13 of the Rajasthan Public Gambling Ordinance, 1949.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 20.07.2026. He submits that the allegation against the petitioner is of gambling and the F.I.R. has been registered under Section 13 of the Rajasthan Public Gambling Ordinance, 1949 as well as under Section 112(2) of the BNS 2023.

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-12312/2026] He further submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature in past. Moreover, the conclusion of investigation/trial will take sufficiently long time and even the offences are triable by Magistrate, and therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Learned counsel also submits that a similarly situated accused Sonu has been enlarged on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.06.2026 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8457/2026 and, therefore, he prays that the petitioner may also be enlarged on bail.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.

4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

5. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the submissions advanced, and particularly the fact that co-accused has already been enlarged on bail; all the offences are triable by Magistrate; looking to the nature of allegations; investigation/trial is likely to take a considerable time; there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner of having committed any offence of similar nature in the past, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application deserves to be accepted.

6. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner - Mosuf S/o Manjoor arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 217/2026, Police Station New Mandi, District Hindaun City, shall be released on bail; provided he

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-12312/2026] furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till the completion of the trial and with additional following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;

(ii) The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; and

(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 64/KRATIKA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead