Rajasthan High Court
CCP/759/2025 of SANTOSH RAIGAR S/O SH. RAMKHILADI RAIGAR, Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 20 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 759/2025 CNR: RJHC020627672025 | URN: CCP / 808U / 2025 Santosh Raigar S/o Sh. Ramkhiladi Raigar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vpo Baman Baroda, Tehsil Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
[2026:RJ-JP:33695]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 759/2025
CNR: RJHC020627672025 | URN: CCP / 808U / 2025
Santosh Raigar S/o Sh. Ramkhiladi Raigar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vpo Baman Baroda, Tehsil Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principle Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Ministry Of Medical, Health And Family Welfare, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
Smt. Gayatri A. Rathore, Principal Secretary, Ministry Of Medical, Health And Family Welfare, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
3.
Dr. Krishna Kant Pathak, Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Main Building, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan.)
4.
Dr. Ravi Prakash Sharma, Director, Medical Health And Family Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Swasthya Bahwan, Jaipur.
5.
Dr. S.S. Agarwal, Director, State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare, Jhalana Doongri Colony, Gaht Ki Guni, Jaipur.
6.
Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical And Health Department, Rajasthan, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.
7.
Dr. Ani Kumar Jaimini, Chief Medical And Health Officer, Gangapur City, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Devendra Kumar Chauhan
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Yash Joshi and
Ms. Tanvisha Pant for
Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
[2026:RJ-JP:33695] (2 of 2) [CCP-759/2025] 20/08/2026 Learned counsels for the parties state that the order of the Court, which is subject matter of this contempt petition, has been complied with. In view of the above, the instant contempt petition is dis- posed of. Contempt notices are discharged. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 139/EKTA SAINI