Rajasthan High Court

CW/16592/2026 of MEERA D/O HANSRAJ SINWAR Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 20 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16592/2026 CNR: RJHC020814472026 | URN: CW / 34844U / 2026 Meera D/o Hansraj Sinwar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o 1 Bhm, Sardarpura Khartha, Tehsil Suratgarh, Sri Ganganagar Rajasthan 335804 ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of

[2026:RJ-JP:33449]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16592/2026

CNR: RJHC020814472026 | URN: CW / 34844U / 2026

Meera D/o Hansraj Sinwar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o 1 Bhm, Sardarpura Khartha, Tehsil Suratgarh, Sri Ganganagar Rajasthan 335804

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department / Medical, Health And Family Welfare Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2.

Director, Medical And Health Services And Family Welfare Department, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jamnalal Bajaj Marg, C-Scheme, Near Deer Park, Jaipur Rajasthan

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Nikhil Kumawat

with Mr. Mohd. Naved

For Respondent(s)

:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

20/08/2026

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite of having higher merit, petitioner has been posted 500 kms. away from the desired place of posting, bypassing his merit and taking of hostile discrimination than the similarly situated persons. It is submitted that the petitioner’s representation is not accepted by the respondents.

2. Heard.

3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the present petition with

[2026:RJ-JP:33449] (2 of 2) [CW-16592/2026] a direction to the petitioner to file a representation before respondent No.2 within a period of seven days and the Respondent No.2 to consider the representation of the petitioner, if filed, and decide the same within a period of 30 days, strictly in accordance with law.

4. In light of the aforestated, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

5. However, if the petitioner still has any grievances, he may avail of appropriate remedies available under the law. (SAMEER JAIN),J 186/CHANDAN

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead