Rajasthan High Court
WRES/302/2026 of M/S SHRIRAM MASALA UDYOG Vs SMT SUSHILA DEVI W/O RAKESH KUMAR on 20 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Restoration Application No. 302/2026 CNR: RJHC020679722026 | URN: WRES / 486U / 2026 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1146/2026 M/s Shriram Masala Udyog, Through Partner Shri Jaibir Singh S/ o Sumer Singh Aged About 57 Years R/o Suraksha Vihar
[2026:RJ-JP:33640]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 302/2025
In
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.962/2024
CNR: RJHC020618842025 | URN: CRES / 610U / 2025
Union of India, Through General Manager, North Western Railway, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
Hanuman Singh Bhati S/o Shri Sonaram, Aged About 44
Years, R/o Near Radha Krishna Temple, Madhuvan Mohalla, Pipal City, District Jodhpur (Rajasthan).
Smt. Vidha Devi W/o Shri Hanuman Singh Bhati, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Near Radha Krishna Temple, Madhuvan Mohalla, Pipal City, District Jodhpur (Rajasthan).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Mohit Balwada
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
20/08/2026
1. Instant restoration application has been filed by and on behalf of Union of India seeking to restore the S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.962/2024.
2. It has been submitted that appeal was filed challenging the award dated 11.12.2023 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Jaipur.
3. Since the compensation amount has already been disbursed, hence, appeal itself has become infructuous, in that view,
[2026:RJ-JP:33640] (2 of 2) [CRES-302/2025] applicant-appellant does not want to pursue the appeal on merit and there is no purpose to continue this restoration application.
4. Accordingly, the restoration application is dismissed as not press. (SUDESH BANSAL),J 29/NITIN