Rajasthan High Court
CW/15774/2025 of RITESH KUMAR S/O LATE SHRI RAMESH PRAKASH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 20 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15774/2025 CNR: RJHC020892802025 | URN: CW / 35889U / 2025 Ritesh Kumar S/o Late Shri Ramesh Prakash, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Saraswati Sadan, Bilada, Jodhpur-342602. (Employee Id- Rjjo201725014007) ----Petitioner
[2026:RJ-JP:33626]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15774/2025
CNR: RJHC020892802025 | URN: CW / 35889U / 2025
Ritesh Kumar S/o Late Shri Ramesh Prakash, Aged About 33
Years, Resident Of Saraswati Sadan, Bilada, Jodhpur-342602.
(Employee Id- Rjjo201725014007)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2.
The Additional Chief Secretary, Home Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
3.
The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter, Behind Nehru Palace, Lal Kothi, Jaipur
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Tanveer Ahamad
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Somitra Chaturvedi, Dy.GC with
Mr. Munendra Singh Fouzdar
Ms. Yashvi Khandelwal with
Mr. Yash Joshi for
Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
20/08/2026
1. Mr. Tanveer Ahamad, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks to withdraw the present writ petition with the liberty to raise all his objections, both on law and facts, including with respect to the scope of Rule 35 of the Rajasthan Police Service Rules, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules of 1954'), by filing a detailed reply to the impugned notices before the competent authority.
[2026:RJ-JP:33626] (2 of 2) [CW-15774/2025]
2. Considering the limited submission so made and without delving into the merits of the matter, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, however, the petitioner would be at liberty to raise all possible objections both on law and facts, including the one with respect to the scope of the Rule 35 of the Rules of 1954, before the competent authority, who would duly consider the same strictly in accordance with law.
3. Pending application(s), if any, stand dismissed. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J 16/DIPESH CHAYAL