Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/3472/2026 of YUVRAJ S/O SHRI DINESH, Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 20 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3472/2026 CNR: RJHC020199342026 | URN: CRLMB / 6186U / 2026 Yuvraj S/o Shri Dinesh, R/o Gali No. 4, Krishnapuri, Modinagar, Ghaziabad, Thana Modinagar, District Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh (Petitioner Is

[2026:RJ-JP:33536]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3472/2026

CNR: RJHC020199342026 | URN: CRLMB / 6186U / 2026

Yuvraj S/o Shri Dinesh, R/o Gali No. 4, Krishnapuri, Modinagar, Ghaziabad, Thana Modinagar, District Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh (Petitioner Is Confined In District Jail, Dholpur)

----Petitioner

Versus

State of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Neeraj Sharma

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, P.P.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR SHARMA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

20/08/2026 The present bail application has been preferred by the petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.18/2025 of Cyber Police Station, District Dholpur for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2) & 318(4) of BNS and 66D of IT Act.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. It is submitted that no specific role has been ascribed to the present petitioner in the alleged cyber crime. Further, no amount of the alleged transaction was received by him and no recovery remains to be made. The offences are triable by the First Class Magistrate and

[2026:RJ-JP:33536] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3472/2026] the chargesheet has already been filed. The petitioner is in judicial custody since long and the trial will take long time. Therefore, it is prayed that the accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS.

6. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 of BNSS (Old Section 439 Cr.P.C.) is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Yuvraj S/o Shri Dinesh shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No. 18/2025 of Cyber Police Station, District Dholpur, provided that he executes a personal bond in a sum of provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (CHANDRA SHEKHAR SHARMA),J 103/RAJENDRA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead