Rajasthan High Court
CFA/1790/2025 of MOHIT VERMA S/O RAJENDRA VERMA, Vs RINKU DHABAI W/O JITENDRA DHABAI, on 20 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 1790/2025 CNR: RJHC020987252025 | URN: CFA / 2947U / 2025 1 Mohit Verma S/o Rajendra Verma, Aged About 44 Years, Resident Of Plot No. C-37, Indrapuri Colony, Lalkothi, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2 Raveena Verma W/o Jitendra Bandawal
[2026:RJ-JP:33396]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 1790/2025
CNR: RJHC020987252025 | URN: CFA / 2947U / 2025
Mohit Verma S/o Rajendra Verma, Aged About 44 Years, Resident Of Plot No. C-37, Indrapuri Colony, Lalkothi, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
Raveena Verma W/o Jitendra Bandawal D/o Rajendra Verma, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of F-12, Nandpuri, Hawa Sadak, Bais Godam, Jaipur.
----Appellants
Versus
Rinku Dhabai W/o Jitendra Dhabai, Aged Adult, Resident- Plot Number B-2, Janta Colony, Ghatgate, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
Rajendra Verma S/o Late Shri Narayan Verma, Aged Adult, Resident Of C-37, Indrapuri Colony, Lalkothi, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
Hanuman Verma S/o Late Shri Narayan Verma, Aged Adult, Resident Of-19, Shiva Colony, Imliwala Fatak, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
Up Panjiyak, Adhikari Amer Tehsil Bhawan Amer District Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Appellant(s)
:
Ms. Jinal Gehalot with
Ms. Surbhi Khandelwal
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Sanjay Joshi
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
20/08/2026 In IA No.1/2026:
1. Matter has come up on application (IA No.1/2026) filed by the applicants/appellants, seeking withdrawal of the present civil first appeal.
[2026:RJ-JP:33396] (2 of 2) [CFA-1790/2025]
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that during the pendency of the present civil first appeal, the parties have settled the pending dispute in the pious spirit of Lok Adalat.
3. In view of the above, and upon instructions from her clients, learned counsel for the appellants does not wish to pursue the present first appeal and seeks permission to withdraw the same. She further prays that the Court fees so paid by the appellants may kindly be refunded back to the appellants.
4. Heard.
5. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed.
6. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the appellants, the present civil first appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and the appellants are entitled for the refund of the Court fees of Rs.77,346/- in terms of the judgment passed by Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of High Court of Judicature at Madras Vs. M.C. Subramaniam & Ors.1, therefore, the Registry is directed to prepare a certificate regarding the refund of the Court fees of Rs.77,346/- in favour of the appellants.
7. In view of the aforesaid discussion, the present first appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
8. All other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J 68/Seema 1 (2021) 3 SCC 560