Rajasthan High Court
CRLMA/377/2026 of AJMAL RAIGAR S/O SUGANARAM RAIGAR Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 20 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 377/2026 CNR: RJHC020799602026 | URN: CRLMA / 931U / 2026 1. Ajmal Raigar S/o Suganaram Raigar, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Mundoti Police Station Badar Sindri, District Ajmer, Currently Residing In Nrusinghapura
[2026:RJ-JP:33583]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 377/2026
CNR: RJHC020799602026 | URN: CRLMA / 931U / 2026
1.
Ajmal Raigar S/o Suganaram Raigar, Aged About 45
Years, R/o Mundoti Police Station Badar Sindri, District Ajmer, Currently Residing In Nrusinghapura Police Station Kaladera, Currently Residing In Kaluram Yadavs Farm Near The River, Tateda Mod, Police Station Govindgarh, District Jaipur (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Jaipur).
2.
Dinesh Kumar Raigar S/o Ajmal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Mundoti Police Station Badar Sindri, District Ajmer, Currently Residing In Nrusinghapura Police Station Kaladera, Currently Residing In Kaluram Yadavs Farm Near The River, Tateda Mod, Police Station Govindgarh, District Jaipur (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Jaipur).
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Anil Jain
Mr. Dushyant Jain
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Devi Singh, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
20/08/2026 The present application has been filed by the applicants for restoration of bail preferred by them which was dismissed vide order dated 28.04.2026 in non-prosecution.
2. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the arguing counsel in the bail application preferred on behalf of the applicants bearing S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.2403/2026, could
[2026:RJ-JP:33583] (2 of 2) [CRLMA-377/2026] not appear before the Court at the time of calling of the matter. Therefore, it is prayed that the present application may be allowed.
3. Having considered the contentions raised in the present application, the same is allowed.
4. Resultantly, S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.2403/2026 is restored to its original number. (CHANDRA SHEKHAR SHARMA),J 100/TWINKLE SINGH