Rajasthan High Court
CCP/1349/2025 of GRAM PANCHAYAT KHEDA BRAHMAN PANCHAYAT SAMITI, Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 20 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1349/2025 CNR: RJHC021069852025 | URN: CCP / 1444U / 2025 Gram Panchayat Kheda Brahman Panchayat Samiti, Deeg Through Its Sarpanch Shri Samay Singh S/o Sunpun Chand, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Kheda Brahman, Teh.
[2026:RJ-JP:33630]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1349/2025
CNR: RJHC021069852025 | URN: CCP / 1444U / 2025
Gram Panchayat Kheda Brahman Panchayat Samiti, Deeg Through Its Sarpanch Shri Samay Singh S/o Sunpun Chand, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Kheda Brahman, Teh. Deeg, Bharatpur.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Rural Development Panchayat Raj Department, Jaipur
2.
Utsav Kaushal, Collector, Office Of The Collector, Nagar Road, Deeg (Raj.)
3.
Devi Singh, Sdm, Office Of The Sdm, Nagar Road, Deeg (Raj.)
4.
Nitesh Goyal, Tehsildar, Office Of The Tehsil, Nagar Road, Deeg
5.
Rajesh Kumar Meena, Superintendent Of Police, Office Of Superintendent Of Police, Nagar Road, Deeg (Raj.)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Ms. Muskan Verma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. V.D. Gathala, AGC
Mr. Ashutosh Udawat, Mr. Saurabh
Sharma & Mr. Prateek Saxena for Mr.
Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG
Mr. Kartikeya Shukla, AAAG & Mr.
Siddharth Sharma, AGC for Mr.
Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
20/08/2026
1. This contempt petition has been filed alleging non- compliance of the order dated 09.09.2025 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7129/2025.
[2026:RJ-JP:33630] (2 of 2) [CCP-1349/2025]
2. Vide order dated 09.09.2025, the respondents were directed to decide the representation of the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-District Collector has placed before this Court a copy of inquiry report got conducted for compliance of the directions of the Court and so also letter dated 16.01.2026 and submits that the compliance of the order has been made.
4. The inquiry report and the letter dated 16.01.2026 are taken on record.
5. In view of the inquiry report and the letter dated 16.01.2026, in opinion of this Court that the respondents have complied with the order dated 09.09.2025.
6. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is disposed of.
7. Contempt notices stand discharged.
8. The petitioner would be at liberty to avail appropriate remedy available to it under law in case, it feels aggrieved by the inquiry report and the decision of the respondents.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J 67/Ashish Kumar