Rajasthan High Court
CW/15665/2026 of DR. TEJKUMAR VASHISHT S/O LATE SHREE JAGANNATH VASHISHT Vs THAKURJI DWARKADHEESH on 19 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15665/2026 CNR: RJHC020772362026 | URN: CW / 33414U / 2026 Dr. Tejkumar Vashisht S/o Late Shree Jagannath Vashisht, R/o Second Floor, Mandir Thakurji Shree Dwarkadheesh, Chaura Rasta, Near Hind Hotel, Chaukdi, Modikhana,
[2026:RJ-JP:33531]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15665/2026
CNR: RJHC020772362026 | URN: CW / 33414U / 2026
Dr. Tejkumar Vashisht S/o Late Shree Jagannath Vashisht, R/o Second Floor, Mandir Thakurji Shree Dwarkadheesh, Chaura Rasta, Near Hind Hotel, Chaukdi, Modikhana, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
Thakurji Dwarkadheesh, Through Trustee, Kirti Shekhar Bhatt Resident of Mandir Thakurji Shree Dwarkadheesh, Near Hind Hotel, Chaura Rasta, Jaipur.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Rajat Ranjan
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
19/08/2026
1. Petitioner is tenant and is aggrieved by order dated 30.06.2026 passed by the Rent Tribunal in Application No.7/2015, not allowing to call for the duplicate rent receipt of the period prior to 01.03.2011 from the respondent-applicant, who in his evidence accepted that the duplicate rent receipts are in his power and possession and he may produce the same before the Court, if so required.
2. After arguing the writ petition for some time, counsel for petitioner submits that in view of the admission of respondent- applicant, if the duplicate rent receipts are not permitted to be called for, at least, it may be observed that in case the duplicate rent receipts are not produced on record by the respondent, an adverse inference should be drawn against respondent.
[2026:RJ-JP:33531] (2 of 2) [CW-15665/2026]
3. Taking into consideration the submission of counsel for petitioner, without interfering to the impugned order, instant writ petition stands disposed of with the observations that the Rent Appellate Tribunal may ponder over this aspect while deciding the present Eviction Petition No. 07/2015, finally on merits.
4. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J 10/NITIN