Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/10338/2026 of AKIL AHMED S/O RAGHUVEER KHAN Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 19 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10338/2026 CNR: RJHC020618762026 | URN: CRLMB / 19156U / 2026 Akil Ahmed S/o Raghuveer Khan, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Ganvdi, Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10338/2026
CNR: RJHC020618762026 | URN: CRLMB / 19156U / 2026
Akil Ahmed S/o Raghuveer Khan, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Ganvdi, Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg.
(At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Non-Petitioner
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Surendra Singh
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Naresh Gupta, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
Judgment / Order
19/08/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 30.06.2026 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kama District Deeg, in Civil Misc. Case (CIS) No.904/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.209/2026, Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg for the offences under Sections 3/25(1)(A) of the Arms Act, 1959.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, as per the FIR version, on the basis of the information received, the police apprehended the petitioner while he was in possession of one “hand-made Desi Katta of 315 Bore”. 3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 10.06.2026. He further submits that the
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-10338/2026] petitioner has been falsely implicated in the F.I.R. He submits that the challan in the case has already been filed.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner of having committed any offence of similar nature in past and only one case under Section 420 and 406 IPC, 1860 pertaining to the year 2019 has been reported. Moreover, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and even the offences are triable by Magistrate, and therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.
6. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
7. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the submissions advanced, and particularly the fact that challan has been filed; all the offences are triable by Magistrate; the conclusion of trial is likely to take a considerable time; there are no criminal antecedents against the accused- petitioner of having committed any offence of similar nature in the past, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application deserves to be accepted.
8. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner - Akil Ahmed S/o Raghuveer Khan arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 209/2026, Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each,
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-10338/2026] to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till the completion of the trial and with additional following conditions:
(i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;
(ii) The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; and
(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 33/KRATIKA