Rajasthan High Court
WMAP/366/2026 of HANSRAJ S/O SHRI NANDKISHORE Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 19 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 366/2026 CNR: RJHC020601752026 | URN: WMAP / 739U / 2026 Hansraj S/o Shri Nandkishore, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Behind The Jail, Nehru Nagar, Ram Dham Colony, Chabra, District Baran, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
[2026:RJ-JP:33234]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 366/2026
CNR: RJHC020601752026 | URN: WMAP / 739U / 2026
Hansraj S/o Shri Nandkishore, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Behind The Jail, Nehru Nagar, Ram Dham Colony, Chabra, District Baran, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Water Resources, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.
Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Division-Ii Chabra, District Baran, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Manish Saini (Through VC)
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma, AGC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNNURI LAXMAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
(Through Video Conferencing) 19/08/2026
1. The present application has been filed by the petitioner seeking recall of the order dated 07.04.2026, passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13161/2023 (Hansraj v. State of Rajasthan & Anr.), whereunder the writ petition was closed.
2. On the said date, i.e. 07.04.2026, a representation was made by learned counsel for the respondent that there was no oral termination and the petitioner was continuing in service and was being regularly paid the wages.
3. This Court, by order dated 07.04.2026, recorded the said submission and the writ petition was closed.
4. The present application has been filed seeking recall of the order dated 07.04.2026, alleging that the petitioner has not been
[2026:RJ-JP:33234] (2 of 2) [WMAP-366/2026] continued in service and no wages are being paid to him by the respondents.
5. Learned counsel for the respondents has produced the statement of the bank account of the placement agency, through which the petitioner was engaged; the said bank account statement reflects the deposit of a certain amount by the respondents.
6. When the respondents are denying that there was any oral termination as claimed by the petitioner and have also produced evidence to the effect that an amount has been deposited by them, the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that no amount was deposited cannot be accepted. If the petitioner has any grievance, he can approach the Labour Court with regard to the non-payment of wages.
7. In the result, with the observations made foregoing, the present application is disposed of. (MUNNURI LAXMAN),J 3/Bhumika Pillai