Rajasthan High Court
CRLMP/3934/2026 of RAMSWAROOP SON OF SHRI SRIYARAM, Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 18 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3934/2026 CNR: RJHC020587272026 | URN: CRLMP / 8840U / 2026 Ramswaroop Son Of Shri Sriyaram, Aged About 57 Years, Resident Of Village Nangal Sumer Singh, Post Mandawar, Tehsil Mahuwa, District Dausa (Raj.)
[2026:RJ-JP:33011]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3934/2026
CNR: RJHC020587272026 | URN: CRLMP / 8840U / 2026
Ramswaroop Son Of Shri Sriyaram, Aged About 57 Years, Resident Of Village Nangal Sumer Singh, Post Mandawar, Tehsil Mahuwa, District Dausa (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
2.
Rakesh Kumar Goyal Son Of Shri Nannuram Goyal, Resident Of House No. 1415, Vijay Nagar, Alwar, Police Station Shivaji Park, Alwar (Raj.)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Harmeet Singh
For Respondent(s)
For Complainant(s)
:
:
Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP
Mr. Rajendra Prasad Gautam
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
18/08/2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 20.05.2025, learned trial Court convicted the petitioner for offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I. Act, 1881 and sentenced him to undergo one year and six months simple imprisonment along with fine of Rs.18,00,000. The said order of conviction and sentence was assailed by the petitioner by way of filing an appeal before the Appellate Court, wherein vide order dated 10.06.2025, while suspending the execution of sentence of the petitioner, a condition was imposed to deposit Rs.3,60,000/- i.e., 20% of the fine amount. Counsel submits that since the petitioner could not deposit the said amount before the trial Court
[2026:RJ-JP:33011] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3934/2026] within the given time period, the petitioner filed an application before the Appellate Court for extension of time, however, the said application was dismissed vide impugned order dated 11.06.2026.
2. Counsel submits that in compliance of the order of this Court dated 23.06.2026, petitioner has deposited 20% of the fine amount before the trial Court and the same may be disbursed in favour of the complainant.
3. In view of the above, this Cr. Misc. Petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned trial Court to disburse the amount of Rs.3,60,000/- i.e., 20% of the fine amount in favour of the complainant after taking an undertaking to the effect that in case the appeal filed by the petitioner is allowed, the complainant would return the said amount to the petitioner with the interest of 6% per annum.
4. Stay application and pending application, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J 297/Dushyant