Rajasthan High Court
/209/2026 of DEEPAK SOGARWAL S/O SHRI SAJJAN SINGH, Vs SHRI RAJEEV SHARMA, on 18 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 209/2026 CNR: RJHC020116402026 | URN: CCP / 226U / 2026 Deepak Sogarwal S/o Shri Sajjan Singh, Aged About 54 Years, R/o House No. B-3 Giriraj Colony Near Railway Station Bharatpur Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri
[2026:RJ-JP:32867]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 209/2026
CNR: RJHC020116402026 | URN: CCP / 226U / 2026
Deepak Sogarwal S/o Shri Sajjan Singh, Aged About 54 Years, R/o House No. B-3 Giriraj Colony Near Railway Station Bharatpur Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Shri Rajeev Sharma, Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Jaipur.
2.
Shri Sharad Kaviraj, Inspector General Of Police, State Crime Record Bureau, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3.
Shri Ram Niwas Mehta, Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Jaipur Road, Ajmer.
4.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Jitendra Singh
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Siddharth Sharma, AGC for
Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG for
respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4
Mr. Dilip Singh for respondent No.3
RPSC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
18/08/2026
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of the order dated 22.08.2025 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6423/2011.
2. Mr. Siddharth Sharma, AGC appearing on behalf of Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG, appears for respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4 Mr. Dilip Singh, Advocate appears for respondent No.3 RPSC.
[2026:RJ-JP:32867] (2 of 2) [CCP-209/2026]
3. The learned counsels appearing for the respondents, state that the operation of the order dated 22.08.2025, which is the subject matter of this contempt petition, has been stayed by the Hon’ble Division Bench vide order dated 13.07.2026 in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.157/2026.
4. In view of the fact that the operation of the order, which is the subject matter of this contempt petition, has been stayed, this Court deems just and proper to dispose this contempt petition.
5. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is disposed of.
6. The petitioner would be at liberty to make an application for revival of this contempt petition in case need arises after disposal of the D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.157/2026 or vacation of the interim order dated 13.07.2026.
7. Contempt notices stand discharged. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 67/ARTI SHARMA