Rajasthan High Court
CCP/170/2026 of MAA BHAGWATI DEGREE COLLEGE Vs SH. KULDEEP RANKA, IAS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY on 18 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 170/2026 CNR: RJHC020084052026 | URN: CCP / 186U / 2026 Maa Bhagwati Degree College, Pichuna, Bharatpur Through Society Mahatma Gandhi Shiksa Samiti, Pichuna, Bharatpur Through Secretary Jagdish Prasad Chaturvedi S/o
[2026:RJ-JP:32863]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 170/2026
CNR: RJHC020084052026 | URN: CCP / 186U / 2026
Maa Bhagwati Degree College, Pichuna, Bharatpur Through Society Mahatma Gandhi Shiksa Samiti, Pichuna, Bharatpur Through Secretary Jagdish Prasad Chaturvedi S/o Shankar Lal Sharma, Aged 54 Years, R/o Village And Post Pichuna, Tehsil Roopbaas, Bharatpur (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Sh. Kuldeep Ranka, Ias Principal Secretary, State Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
Sh. Om Prakash Bairwa, Ias Commissioner College Education, Block-4, Dr. Radha Krishan Shiksha Sankul, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur.
3.
Shri Pushkar Mittal, Ras, Registrar, Maharaja Surajmal Brij University, Bharatpur.
4.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Khurshid Ahmad Khan
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG with
Ms. Ritika Naruka and
Mr. Jitendra Kumar Takar
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
18/08/2026
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of the order dated 13.01.2026 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.411/2026.
[2026:RJ-JP:32863] (2 of 2) [CCP-170/2026]
2. Vide interim order dated 13.01.2026, the respondent No.2- Commissioner College Education was directed to issue NOC to the petitioner Institution.
3. The learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondent No.1, 2 and 4 including the Director College Education, states that the NOC has already been issued to the petitioner Institution on 05.03.2026.
4. In view of the fact that NOC has already been issued to the petitioner vide order dated 05.03.2026, in opinion of this Court the substantial compliance of the order has been made by the respondents.
5. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is disposed of.
6. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to make an application for revival of the contempt petition in case the consequential reliefs on account of issuance of NOC are not granted to the petitioner by any of the authorities.
7. Contempt notices are discharged. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 66/ARTI SHARMA