Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/12084/2026 of KOMAL PREET SINGH @ KOMAL SON OF JOGA SINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 18 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 12084/2026 CNR: RJHC020735572026 | URN: CRLMB / 22206U / 2026 Komal Preet Singh @ Komal Son Of Joga Singh, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Village Sodiwala, Police Station Lakhu Ke Barhan, District
[2026:RJ-JP:33020]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 12084/2026
CNR: RJHC020735572026 | URN: CRLMB / 22206U / 2026
Komal Preet Singh @ Komal Son Of Joga Singh, Aged About 23
Years, Resident Of Village Sodiwala, Police Station Lakhu Ke Barhan, District Firozpur, Punjab (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Jaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Gurvindra Singh
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
(Through Video Conferencing)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
18/08/2026
1. The instant second bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS. The accused- petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 296/2025 registered at Police Station Brahmpuri, District Jaipur City (North) for the offences punishable under Sections 308(5) and 309(4) of BNS and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act.
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the first bail application of the petitioner was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 20.04.2026. The charge-sheet in the present case was submitted on 18.02.2026, thereafter the statement of victim could not be recorded despite all endeavour by the Trial
[2026:RJ-JP:33020] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12084/2026] Court. Therefore, considering the long custody of the petitioner, the second bail application may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed and contended that the first bail application of the petitioner was dismissed on merits.
5. Heard learned counsels for the parties and perused the material available on record.
6. Considering the fact that the first bail application of the petitioner was dismissed after considering the entire material available on record. There is no change in circumstances in the present case. Therefore, considering the above facts, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
7. Accordingly, the second bail application of the petitioner is dismissed with liberty to file afresh after recording of the statement of complainant Dalen Barman.
8. The Trial Court is expected to make all endeavour to record the statement of the Dalen Barman expeditiously on priority basis. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J 18/Devanshi Upadhyay