Rajasthan High Court
CCP/1337/2025 of DR. ROHIT YADAV S/O SHRI RANVIR SINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 18 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1337/2025 CNR: RJHC021077722025 | URN: CCP / 1429U / 2025 Dr. Rohit Yadav S/o Shri Ranvir Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o H. No. 132, Pota (8), Mahendragarh, Pota, Haryana - 123027 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of
[2026:RJ-JP:32933]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1337/2025
CNR: RJHC021077722025 | URN: CCP / 1429U / 2025
Dr. Rohit Yadav S/o Shri Ranvir Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o
H. No. 132, Pota (8), Mahendragarh, Pota, Haryana - 123027
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Medical, Department Of Medical And Health Services Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
Iqubal Khan, The Commissioner Rajmes/ Director (P.h.), Medical And Health Services, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Swasthaya Bhawan, C-Scheme, Ashok Nagar, Jaipur - 302007 (Raj.).
3.
Rakesh Saboo, The Principal, Govt. Medical College, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Arun Chaudhary
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Surya Pratap Singh Rajawat
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
18/08/2026
1. The present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner for non-compliance of the order dated 28.08.2025.
2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the respondents have complied with the directions given in the order dated 28.08.2025.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also does not dispute the fact that the directions given in the order have been complied. However, he submits that experience certificate has not been issued by the respondents.
[2026:RJ-JP:32933] (2 of 2) [CCP-1337/2025]
4. Learned counsel for the respondents, as regards the issuance of the experience certificate, submits that the same is under consideration of the Authorities.
5. Looking to the admit fact that whatever the directions given in the order has been complied by the respondents, in the opinion of the Court the substantial compliance of the order has been made. Hence, present contempt petition is disposed of.
6. However, in case the respondents do not issue the experience certificate as applied by the petitioner, he may avail the appropriate remedy available to him under law.
7. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 99/SHRUTI SHARMA