Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/11024/2026 of PIYUSH KUMAR TRIVEDI S/O VINOD KUMAR TRIVEDI Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 18 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 11024/2026 CNR: RJHC020661162026 | URN: CRLMB / 20389U / 2026 Piyush Kumar Trivedi S/o Vinod Kumar Trivedi, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Near P.g. College, In Front Of First Tower, Police Station
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No.
11024/2026
CNR: RJHC020661162026 | URN: CRLMB / 20389U / 2026
Piyush Kumar Trivedi S/o Vinod Kumar Trivedi, Aged About 26
Years, R/o Near P.g. College, In Front Of First Tower, Police Station Kotwali, District Dausa ( At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Anil Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
18/08/2026
1. The instant second bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS. The accused- petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.34/2025 registered at Police Station SOG, District ATS and SOG for the offence punishable under Section 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC and 66D of Information Technology Act (Amended) Act, 2008.
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the accused-petitioner that the first bail application of the petitioner was dismissed by
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-11024/2026] this Court vide order dated 15.05.2026. Thereafter, co-accused Devendra Singh was enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench vide its order dated 02.06.2026. It is further submitted that the case of the present petitioner stands on a better footing than that of co-accused Devendra Singh as the co-accused Devendra Singh applied for provisional registration as a doctor on the basis of allegedly forged documents whereas the present petitioner did not make any such application. Therefore, considering the aforesaid circumstances and the subsequent development, the second bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the second bail application. It is contended that the petitioner on the basis of forged and fabricated documents secured admission to an internship at Karauli Medical College, despite the fact that having obtained his medical degree from Georgia was not eligible to undergo such internship. Therefore, in view of the specific allegations and the nature and gravity of the offence, the second bail application of the petitioner deserves dismissal.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
5. This Court in similar circumstances, in the case of Indraj Singh Gurjar @ Inder Vs. State of Rajasthan in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.7843/2026, has considered the nature of allegations and dismissed the bail application though the said case arises out of a different FIR.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the present case, the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-11024/2026] and the material available on record, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the second bail application of the petitioner is hereby dismissed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J 16/Anshul