Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/12172/2026 of VIKAS KUMAR S/O RAMCHANDRA Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 18 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12172/2026 CNR: RJHC020738282026 | URN: CRLMB / 22378U / 2026 Vikas Kumar S/o Ramchandra, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Suga Pepar, P.S. Patahi, District Mutihari, Purvi Chamaran, Bihar. (At Present
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12172/2026
CNR: RJHC020738282026 | URN: CRLMB / 22378U / 2026
Vikas Kumar S/o Ramchandra, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Suga Pepar, P.S. Patahi, District Mutihari, Purvi Chamaran, Bihar.
(At Present Confined In District Jail Beawar, District Beawar).
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Vishal Gurjar, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP
Ms. Neha Goyal, AAAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
18/08/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of the accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.241/2026 registered at Police Station-Vijay Nagar, District-Beawar for the offences under Sections 8/15 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the recovery of afeem doda post chura from the possession of the accused-petitioner is 27 Kg. 640 grams, which is below the commercial quantity. He submits that the co- accused-Amarjeet Kaur has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. He further contended that the
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-12172/2026] accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 17.06.2026 and trial of the case may take considerable time and there is no other criminal antecedent registered against the accused-petitioner, therefore, he prayed that the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
4. Heard and perused the material available on record.
5. In the present case, the accused-petitioner is in custody since 17.06.2026 and recovered contraband article is less than commercial quantity and the co-accused-Amarjeet Kaur has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Considering the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner, looking to the facts of the case and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused/petitioner-Vikas Kumar S/o Ramchandra, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. As per order dated 31.01.2023 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SMWP (Criminal) No.04/2021 In Re Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail & SLP (Cri.) No.529/2021, the
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-12172/2026] copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned Jail Authority via e-mail to inform the accused-petitioner. (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J GAURAV SHARMA/36