Rajasthan High Court
CR/354/2025 of KHEMCHAND SHARMA SON OF SHRI RAMSWAROOP SHARMA, Vs SHRAVANI DEVI DAUGHTER OF LATE SHRI BANSHIDHAR, WIFE OF SHRI BABULAL SHARMA on 18 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 354/2025 Khemchand Sharma Son of Shri Ramswaroop Sharma, Aged About 39 Years, Resident of 57, Nada Ke Dhani, Muhana, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shravani Devi Daughter of Late Shri
[2026:RJ-JP:8398]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 354/2025
Khemchand Sharma Son of Shri Ramswaroop Sharma, Aged About 39 Years, Resident of 57, Nada Ke Dhani, Muhana, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Shravani Devi Daughter of Late Shri Banshidhar, Wife of Shri Babulal Sharma, Resident of Gram Kanadvaas, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur, at present resident of Mehto Ka Bass, Chandlai, Tehsil Chaksu District Jaipur Rajasthan.
2.
Ramnarayan Son of Late Shri Banshidhar, Resident of Gram Kanadvaas, Tehsil Bassi. District Jaipur Rajasthan.
3.
Rampyari Daughter of Late Shri Banshidhar Wife of Shri Ramswaroop Sharma, Resident of 57, Nada Ke Dhani, Muhana, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4.
Sub Registrar, Sanganer Second, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur.
5.
Sub Registrar, Bassi Tehsil, Bassi. District Jaipur.
6.
State of Rajasthan, Through Tehsildar Bassi. Tehsil Bassi District Jaipur Rajasthan.
7.
Deputy Commissioner, Zone-09, Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur Indira Circle, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Vichitr
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
24/02/2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of the present revision petition, the revenue suit No.160/2024 has been decreed in favour of plaintiff-respondent No.1-Shravani Devi, therefore, the ground for rejection of suit
[2026:RJ-JP:8398] (2 of 2) [CR-354/2025] mentioned in the application dated 06.11.2024 filed under Order 7 Rule 11 read with Section 151 of CPC is no longer available to the defendant/ petitioner. Thus, the present revision petition has become infructuous.
2. In view of the above, the present revision petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous due to subsequent development i.e. decree passed in the Revenue Suit No.160/2024.
3. All other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /15