Rajasthan High Court
CSA/327/2022 of VIJAY SINGH S/O JAGMAAL SINGH Vs RAMOTI ALIAS VIMLA DEVI D/O LATE JAMURA on 18 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 327/2022 CNR: RJHC020916232022 | URN: CSA / 573U / 2022 1 Vijay Singh S/o Jagmaal Singh, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Hamidpur, Tehsil Behror, Distrit Alwar, Rajasthan. 2 Sawantram S/o Mangalram, R/o Hamidpur, Tehsil Behror,
[2026:RJ-JP:32954]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 327/2022
CNR: RJHC020916232022 | URN: CSA / 573U / 2022
Vijay Singh S/o Jagmaal Singh, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Hamidpur, Tehsil Behror, Distrit Alwar, Rajasthan.
Sawantram S/o Mangalram, R/o Hamidpur, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar, Rajasthan. (Since Deceased Through Legal Representatives).
2.1
Bhoop Singh S/o Sawantram, R/o Hamidpur, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar, Rajasthan.
2.2
Ashok S/o Sawantram, R/o Hamidpur, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar, Rajasthan.
2.3
Mukesh S/o Sawantram, R/o Hamidpur, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar, Rajasthan.
2.4
Lali S/o Sawantram, R/o Hamidpur, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar, Rajasthan.
2.5
Sunita S/o Sawantram, R/o Hamidpur, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Appellants
Versus
Ramoti Alias Vimla Devi D/o Late Jamura, R/o Hamidpur, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar, Raj. At Present W/o Rohitashwa, R/o Gali No. 2, Keshav Nagar, Narnaul, District Mahendragarh, Haryana.
Deputy Registrar, Behror, District Alwar, Raj.
----Respondents
For Appellant(s)
:
Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Yaduvanshi
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Amit Jindal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
18/08/2026
1. Learned counsel for the parties upon instructions from their respective clients, submit that the compromise has arrived at between the parties.
2. In view of the compromise, they are in process of executing the documents in terms of compromise, therefore, they seek permission to withdraw the present second appeal.
3. Permission sought for is granted.
4. Accordingly, the present second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
5. All pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Deepa-108s