Rajasthan High Court
CCP/386/2026 of NAIMUDDIN GUDDU S/O ANIMUDDIN Vs JOGARAM PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, on 17 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 386/2026 CNR: RJHC020227982026 | URN: CCP / 408U / 2026 Naimuddin Guddu S/o Animuddin, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Plot No. 133-134, Masjid Gali, Police Line Kesdar Bagh, Kota Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Jogaram
[2026:RJ-JP:32419]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 386/2026
CNR: RJHC020227982026 | URN: CCP / 408U / 2026
Naimuddin Guddu S/o Animuddin, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Plot No. 133-134, Masjid Gali, Police Line Kesdar Bagh, Kota Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Jogaram Principal Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
Trilok Chand Meena, Additional Commissioner Cum Deputy Secretary To The Government-Ii (Enquiry)
Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj (Panchayati Raj) Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
3.
Peush Samaria Ias, District Collector Kota District Kota.
4.
Kamal Meena, Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Kota Rajasthan.
5.
Shailesh Ranjan, Development Officer Panchayat Samiti Ladpura District Kota Rajasthan.
6.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Ms. Kamini Pareek on behalf of
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
17/08/2026
[2026:RJ-JP:32419] (2 of 2) [CCP-386/2026] The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the respondents have made compliance of the order, which is the subject matter of the present contempt petition. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the present contempt petition stands disposed of. Contempt notices are discharged. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 126/ARTI SHARMA