Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/8609/2026 of JAHUL S/O CHOUDU Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 17 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8609/2026 CNR: RJHC020529662026 | URN: CRLMB / 15732U / 2026 1 Jahul S/o Choudu, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Levda, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg. (At Present In Sub Jail Kaman, Deeg). 2 Babbar @ Sahil
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8609/2026
CNR: RJHC020529662026 | URN: CRLMB / 15732U / 2026
Jahul S/o Choudu, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Levda, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg.
(At Present In Sub Jail Kaman, Deeg).
Babbar @ Sahil S/o Aameen, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Levda, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg.
(At Present In Sub Jail Kaman, Deeg).
----Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Vikram Singh Chauhan
Mr. Rajneesh Gupta
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
Judgment / Order
17/08/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 26.05.2026, passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge Kaman, District- Deeg, in Bail Application No.717/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioners was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.32/2025, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg for the offences under Sections 111(2)(a), 318(4), 319(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) & 61(2)(a) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in custody since 03.05.2026. He further submits that there is one another case of similar nature reported to be
(2 of 4) [CRLMB-8609/2026] pending against the present petitioner No. 1-Jahul. He further submits that petitioners have been implicated on the statement of three main accused persons namely Mujahid, Jogendra & Shrikant. He further submits that three main accused persons namely Mujahid, Jogendra & Shrikant have aleardy been enlarged on bail by the learned Trial Court as the Investigating Agency failed to file the charge-sheet within the time period and they were granted the benefit of default bail. He further submits that the case of the petitioner is on no lesser footing than that of the main accused namely Mujahid, Jogendra & Shrikant, who were granted bail by the learned Trial Court.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the challan has been filed and except an offence under Section 111(2)
(a) of the BNS, 2023, all the offence are triable by Magistrate. He contends that the conclusion of the trial is likely to take considerable time. He further submitted that the petitioners are ready and willing to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court, and accordingly prays that they be enlarged on bail.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the present bail application.
5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the submissions advanced, and particularly the fact that challan has been filed; except an offence under Section 111(2)(a) of the BNS, 2023; the conclusion of trial is likely to take considerable time; petitioners are in custody since
(3 of 4) [CRLMB-8609/2026] 03.05.2026; there is one another case of similar nature reported to be pending against the present petitioner No.1-Jahul, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioners deserves to be accepted subject to imposition of stringent conditions.
7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely (i) Jahul S/o Choudu & (ii) Babbar @ Sahil S/o Aameen arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.32/2025, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg, shall be released on bail; provided each of them furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions:
(i) The petitioners shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;
(ii) The petitioners shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected, of the commission of which they are suspected;
(iii) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and
(iv) In the event the petitioners are found involved in any other case of similar nature in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein.
(v) The accused-petitioners shall mark their presence before the concerned police station once in a month as fixed by the
(4 of 4) [CRLMB-8609/2026] Investigating Officer and a register shall be maintained for the same by Investigating Officer.
(vi) In case of any change of residential address, the accused- petitioners shall immediately inform the Investigating Officer as well as the trial Court. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 14/MAHIMA