Rajasthan High Court
CCP/1384/2025 of MAHIPAL SINGH KULHARI S/O SHRI SULTAN SINGH, Vs SHRI KRISHAN KUNAL on 17 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1384/2025 CNR: RJHC021080672025 | URN: CCP / 1481U / 2025 1. Mahipal Singh Kulhari S/o Shri Sultan Singh, Aged About 55 Years, R/o 221, Fronterior, Colony, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Sushil Jain S/o Late Shri Dhan
[2026:RJ-JP:32683]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1384/2025
CNR: RJHC021080672025 | URN: CCP / 1481U / 2025
1.
Mahipal Singh Kulhari S/o Shri Sultan Singh, Aged About 55 Years, R/o 221, Fronterior, Colony, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2.
Sushil Jain S/o Late Shri Dhan Kumar Jain, Aged About 55
Years, R/o 102/19, Patel Marg, Man Sarover, Jaipur - 302020, Rajasthan
3.
Devraj Sharma S/o Shri Umashankar Sharma, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Plot No. 8, Chithwadi Ka Bagh, Gangapole, Jaipur-302002, Rajasthan.
4.
Satish Kumar Vashisth S/o Shri Radhey Shayam Vashisth, Aged About 58 Years, R/o A 104, Jagdamba Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur - 302021, Rajasthan
5.
Rajesh Kumar Naruka S/o Shri Roop Singh Naruka, Aged About 57 Years, R/o D-38, A, Mahesh Nagar, 80 Feet Road, Jaipur - 302015, Rajasthan.
6.
Satish Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Niranjan Lal Sharma, Aged About 50 Years, R/o A-134, Ram Gali No. 4, Rajapark, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
Shri Krishan Kunal, Secretary To The Government Department Of Secondary Education, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. D.P. Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG, assisted by
Mr. Vishal Kumar
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
17/08/2026 This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of order dated 24.09.2025, whereby the
[2026:RJ-JP:32683] (2 of 2) [CCP-1384/2025] respondents were directed to decide the representation of the petitioner by passing a speaking order. Mr. Manoj Sharma, Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents states that the representation submitted by the petitioner has been considered and decided by reasoned order dated 18.05.2026. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner does not controvert this fact. In view of passing of order dated 18.05.2026, in opinion of this Court, substantial compliance of the Courts’ order has been made. Hence this contempt petition is disposed of. Contempt notices are discharged. Pending application/s, if any, also stand/s disposed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/91