Rajasthan High Court
CW/12451/2026 of SATYANARAYAN S/O LATE SHRI MOHAN LAL SHARMA Vs SHRI ANIL SHARMA S/O LATE SHRI BANWARI LAL SHARMA on 17 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12451/2026 CNR: RJHC020641122026 | URN: CW / 27413U / 2026 Satyanarayan S/o Late Shri Mohan Lal Sharma, Aged About 62 Years, Resident Of House No. 2442, Telipada, Patwon Ki Haveli, Chowkri Vishveshwar Ji, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
[2026:RJ-JP:32562]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12451/2026
CNR: RJHC020641122026 | URN: CW / 27413U / 2026
Satyanarayan S/o Late Shri Mohan Lal Sharma, Aged About 62
Years, Resident Of House No. 2442, Telipada, Patwon Ki Haveli, Chowkri Vishveshwar Ji, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
----Petitioner
Versus
Shri Anil Sharma S/o Late Shri Banwari Lal Sharma, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of House No. 2442, Telipada, Patwon Ka Rasta, Chowkri Vishveshwar Ji, Jaipur.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Naveen Dhuwan
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
17/08/2026
1. Petitioner has filed instant writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking direction against the trial Court to abide by the mandatory timeline, fixed by the High Court in the order dated 11.11.2024, passed in S. B. Civil Petition No.15770/2020.
2. The grievance of petitioner is that the preliminary decree for partition was passed on the terms and conditions, mutually agreed between the parties but since respondent did not abide by the conditions, hence, petitioner filed application under Order 20 Rule 18 read with Section 151 CPC, which has not been decided by the trial Court on merits, till date.
[2026:RJ-JP:32562] (2 of 2) [CW-12451/2026]
3. This Court finds that in the order dated 11.11.2024, directions to decide the application under Order 20 Rule 18 read with Section 151 CPC have already been issued, hence, no further directions are required and counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this writ petition.
4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
5. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J 4/POORAN CHAND GUPTA