Rajasthan High Court

CRLMP/2061/2009 of NARROWCASTERS PVT. LTD. AND ANR. Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR. on 17 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2061/2009 CNR: RJHC020103622009 | URN: CRLMP / 3405U / 2009 1. Narrowcasters (India) Private Limited, Registered Office 508, Devika Towers, 6, Nehru Palace, New Delhi 110019 through Alok Bhatt, authorized agent

[2026:RJ-JP:32542]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2061/2009

CNR: RJHC020103622009 | URN: CRLMP / 3405U / 2009

1. Narrowcasters (India) Private Limited, Registered Office 508, Devika Towers, 6, Nehru Palace, New Delhi 110019 through Alok Bhatt, authorized agent Narrowcasters (India) Private Limited

2. Lady Penelope Street W/o SR Lorence Street, Director, Narrowcasters (India) Private Limited, Registered Office 508, Devika Towers, 6, Nehru Palace, New Delhi 110019

----Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan

----Non-petitioner

2. Sanjay Khandelwal S/o Krishan Kumar R/o Ward no.10

Subhash Chowk, Ramgarh Shekhawati, District Sikar F-53, Sector 41, Noida 201303 (Uttar Pradesh)

Complainant Non-petitioner

Connected With

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1162/2009

CNR: RJHC020119062009 | URN: CRLR / 2055U / 2009

Sanjay Khandelwal

----Petitioner

Versus

State And Ors

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

None in Criminal Misc. Petition

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Gaurav Gupta for Mr. Sanjay

Khandelwal

Mr. Manish K. Sharma

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

17/08/2026 S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2061/2009:-

[2026:RJ-JP:32542] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2061/2009]

1. On 06.03.2026 learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners have pleaded no instructions and this Court has directed to issue notice to petitioners and this Court has already issued notice but same has not been served.

2. We have considered the fact that 482 Cr.P.C. petition is filed by the petitioners themselves and if they are not aware or vigilant about pendency of their petition then there is no need to issue notice as misc. proceeding is not a prosecution wherein it is necessary to decide the same on merits.

3. Considering the attempt made pursuant to order dated 06.03.2026, I am of the considered view that misc. petition is liable to be dismissed as no one has appeared to pursue the matter. The petitioners have also lost interest due to efflux of time.

4. In view of aforesaid, misc. petition no. 2061/2009 is dismissed for non-prosecution.

5. Misc. application, if any, stands disposed of. S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1162/2009:-

1. List this case before appropriate roster. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J 22-23/CHETNA BEHRANI

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead