Rajasthan High Court
CW/15671/2026 of M/S. SHRI SAI AUTO FINANCE Vs THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER on 17 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15671/2026 CNR: RJHC020766102026 | URN: CW / 33426U / 2026 M/s. Shri Sai Auto Finance, 1St Floor, F-2 Plot No. 42, Sai Kripa First, Jai Bhawani Nagar, Khatipura, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302021 Through Its Proprietor Shri Chirag
[2026:RJ-JP:32430-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15671/2026
CNR: RJHC020766102026 | URN: CW / 33426U / 2026
M/s. Shri Sai Auto Finance, 1St Floor, F-2 Plot No. 42, Sai Kripa First, Jai Bhawani Nagar, Khatipura, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302021
Through Its Proprietor Shri Chirag Taneja Son Of Shri Ghanshyam Taneja.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
The Assistant Commissioner, SGST, Circle-C, Ward -II, Jaipur III, Regional Kar Bhawan, Jhalana Institutional Area, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan.
2.
The Appellate Authority- Third, SGST, Jaipur, Kar Bhawan, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302001.
3.
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Finance Secretary (Revenue), Finance Department, Government Of Rajasthan, 1St Floor, Main Building, Government Secretariat, Janpath, Jaipur, Rajasthan-302005.
4.
The Union Of India, Through Its Revenue Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of Revenue, Room No.
46, North Block, New Delhi 110001.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Vikram Kumar Gogra
Ms. Vaibhav Gogra
Mr. Kaushal Soni
Mr. Aman Gupta
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG with
Ms. Chelsi Agarwal, AAAG
Ms. Anima Chaturvedi
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
17/08/2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty to refile the same by appending the necessary documents as well as giving better explanation with respect to the
[2026:RJ-JP:32430-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-15671/2026] delay that was caused in assailing the order-in-original before the Appellate Authority.
2. May do so.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed with liberty as aforesaid.
4. All pending applications also stand disposed of. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J (ARUN MONGA),J 7/AARZOO/TUSHAR