Rajasthan High Court
CRLMP/1827/2026 of RAM PRASAD DHAKAR S/O HARIRAM DHAKAR, Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 17 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1827/2026 CNR: RJHC020271132026 | URN: CRLMP / 4185U / 2026 1. Ram Prasad Dhakar S/o Hariram Dhakar, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Village Kumhariya, Tehsil Sarwar, District Ajmer. 2. Gopal Dhakar S/o Hariram
[2026:RJ-JP:32687]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1827/2026
CNR: RJHC020271132026 | URN: CRLMP / 4185U / 2026
1.
Ram Prasad Dhakar S/o Hariram Dhakar, Aged About 50
Years, Resident Of Village Kumhariya, Tehsil Sarwar, District Ajmer.
2.
Gopal Dhakar S/o Hariram Dhakar, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Village Kumhariya, Tehsil Sarwar, District Ajmer
3.
Bajrang Dhakar S/o Hariram Dhakar, Aged About 35
Years, Resident Of Village Kumhariya, Tehsil Sarwar, District Ajmer.
4.
Shailendra Singh Rathore S/o Mohan Singh, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of Darikhana, Ward No. 10, Syar, Fatehgarh, Sarwar, District Ajmer.
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
2.
Kajod Dhakar S/o Kanaram Dhakar, Aged About 65 Years, Resident Of Village Kumhariya, Tehsil Sarwar, District Ajmer
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Sandeep Kumar Maheshwari
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP
Mr. Surya Pratap Singh, for
complainant
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
17/08/2026
1. Parties are present in person and they have duly been identified by their respective counsel.
2. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.286/2023 registered at Police Station Sarwar, District Kekri for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that property dispute has been resolved by the parties amicably. It is submitted
[2026:RJ-JP:32687] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1827/2026] that civil suits pending between the parties have been disposed of under the mutual settlement. It is submitted that on account of compromise, further proceedings in the impugned FIR are fruitless and continuation thereof would be a futile exercise and a waste of precious judicial time and resources. The copy of compromise has been annexed with this petition.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise.
5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties.
6. In view of the above, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the FIR No.286/2023 registered at Police Station Sarwar, District Kekri, is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow.
7. Stay Application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J 238/CHARU SONI