Rajasthan High Court
CCP/911/2026 of VASIM AKRAM S/O IMAMUDDIN, Vs SMT. GAYATRI RATHORE, on 17 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 911/2026 CNR: RJHC020502742026 | URN: CCP / 957U / 2026 Vasim Akram S/o Imamuddin, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Vpo Lawa, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Smt. Gayatri Rathore, Principal
[2026:RJ-JP:32488]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 911/2026
CNR: RJHC020502742026 | URN: CCP / 957U / 2026
Vasim Akram S/o Imamuddin, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Vpo Lawa, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Smt. Gayatri Rathore, Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Gov- ernment Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan(302005).
2.
Shri Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Director, Medical Health Ser- vices, Rajasthan, Jaipur (302016).
3.
Dr. Ashutosh Garg, Director, State Institute Of Health And Famil Welfare (Sihfw), Jhalana Industrial Area, Jaipur
(302004).
4.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Depart- ment Of Medical Health Services, Government Of Ra- jasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Laxmi Kant Malpura
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Yash Joshi &
Ms. Tanvisha Pant on behalf of
Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
17/08/2026
1. Counsel for the petitioner states that the respondents have decided the representation of the petitioner in compliance of the order which is the subject matter of this contempt petition.
2. In view of the statement made by the counsel for the petitioner, the present contempt petition is disposed of.
3. Contempt notices are discharged.
[2026:RJ-JP:32488] (2 of 2) [CCP-911/2026]
4. The petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the decision taken on representation, if he feels aggrieved by the same. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J RAHUL MIRKHANI/29